Why would the Iowa House vote to ban texting while driving for only teens?
The Iowa Senate put the House in its place quickly, very quickly, said "NO" to the House version of the texting while driving ban, which was written only for teens. In essence the Senate said, "Are you serious? Get real and stop wasting our time."
And I agree. It's sort of like the Iowa House is driving a Toyota and their gas pedal is stuck but the car is shifted into reverse. If you're going to ban texting do it for everyone. I'm beginning to see the texting drivers' signature front ends, all smashed. Confirmation of seen by looking at the clueless driver, still texting while driving. Can you say "Clueless!".
Age isn't a guarantee of common sense; you'd think it would be but it's not. They are out there between 16 and 60, texting away to who knows who and about what who cars.
For good advice see a lawyer and if you have questions about this blog, the law or your case write or call me directly. Steve Lombardi, sdlombardi@aol.com and 515-222-1110. I handle all types of personal injury cases including car accidents, truck accidents, motorcycle accidents, workers' compensation cases. We help truckers all across the country who come through Iowa and end up in an accident. If we need other lawyers from other states we hire them and it costs you no more than what you would pay us; in other words, we split the fee between us. We also handle other civil types of cases and do defend when called upon. After all I am a lawyer. So call 515-222-1110 or email us at sdlombardi@aol.com. 
Post a comment
Post a Comment to "Why would the Iowa House vote to ban texting while driving for only teens?"
To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."