

I drove to Iowa City this weekend for Parent's Day at the Law School. On the return trip to Des Moines Barbara and I passed through this work construction zone at the Oxford exit on I-80. The road work zone seems small. I suspect, although I can't say for sure, that it's on the westbound lanes. Here is our original news story.
We don’t have much information this morning, but it’s being reported by Radio Iowa and the Des Moines Register that a road construction crew on I-80 near Oxford, Iowa were injured with a semi-truck collided with one of the cement or concrete barriers in a construction zone. Oxford is about nine miles west of Coralville, Iowa. The collision occurred late yesterday morning. You have to wonder if the semi-truck driver was texting or talking on a cell phone.
One of my clients is a road crew member injured on I-380. Since looking at that case and driving through other Interstate road construction on I-35, I-80, I-235 and I-380 it shocks me how distracted drivers are when negotiating through the construction zone. People driving right up to the orange cones, exceeding the speed limit, talking on their cell phones and allowing so many other distractions while driving that I find it difficult to catalogue them all. On the way home one lady driving a State of Iowa car and the car behind her being driven by a DNR officer are both on cell phones. And I’m not talking about for a few minutes I’m talking about mile after mile after mile. More than 25 miles, which is when I got tired of wondering if she’d put the phone down and drove off ahead. You’d think safety officers would know better. Apparently they don’t.
Can we start with an assumption: That interstate highways are a dangerous place due to cars and semi trucks driving at higher speeds; due also to wrong-way drivers, drunks and inexperienced drivers. Now let's talk this morning about youthful inexperience, distracted driving and cheating the law that is intended to save youthful lives. After we look at this morning’s news item from the Des Moines Register I'm going to end with a warning to the parents who cheat by asking the wrong question and focusing their children's attention on the lawyers rather than youthful inexperience.
NEWS ITEM:
A 15-year-old driver rolled a white minivan as she neared the Iowa River on Interstate-380 in Johnson County. In the van were two 16-year-old passengers. One was reported to have died and the other taken to University Hospitals in Iowa City.
LET'S ANALYZE THE LAW AND THE FACTS:
All were apparently high school students who’d just finished a volleyball game and were heading out to get a bite to eat. The 15-year-old driver was Rachel Stewart of North Liberty. Her two passengers were Alyssa Benedict and Rachel Petersen. Young Ms. Benedict is listed as the fatality.
“Clear Creek Amana Principal Tom McDonald said Benedict and two friends were apparently going to get something to eat after attending a volleyball game at the school in Tiffin.”
In Iowa a 15-year-old can drive with a learner’s permit and a school permit. Those permits allow them to drive directly to and from school-related functions, like volleyball. The permissible hours are 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. This accident is reported to have happened at 8:45 p.m. Passengers are allowed to ride along but I’m not sure the law allows the driver to veer from the most direct route between home and school or the extracurricular activity. Reports indicate that Benedict and Petersen were not wearing seat belts. Another report has the van entering the median area before rolling over. But let’s get back to the time sequence to decide if this trip was a good idea for teens, so that teens can learn from the mistakes made in this case and to stay out of future trouble.
Reports show they were at a school event at Clear Creek Amana in Tiffin. The driver lived in North Liberty, the two passengers in Tiffin, Iowa. At the time of the collision they were driving south on I-380, a four lane divided highway. The collision occurred at the 8 mile marker. It should be clear that if you’re at a school in Tiffin and the two passengers live in Tiffin then there’s no reason to be on I-380 taxiing passengers; no matter how hungry they may be. Tiffin is west of I-380 and North Liberty is northwest of Tiffin. Using MapQuest shows there are 8.31 miles between the two towns that takes a mere 13 minutes to drive and doesn’t include any travel being necessary on I-380. In other words I-380 isn’t a direct route. So why were they even on I-380?
The MapQuest directions include E 3rd Street toward Main Street, then right onto Main Street, turn right onto E. Marengo Road/U.S. 6 East, then left onto Coral Ridge Ave., turn right on E. Penn Street, then right on N. Dubuque Street to North Liberty.
Google Maps shows the direct route.
The question remains to be answered whether the law allowed this special minor driver to even be on I-380 and then whether it was possible to get something to eat and get everyone home by the permitted curfew of 10 p.m.
Of course there is also the question of whether these teens could legally make this food run.
“The reason Stewart lost control of the van has not been made public by the Iowa State Patrol. McDonald said he received an unconfirmed report that a rear tire had blown.”
State law allows young drivers with learner’s permits and a school permit to drive to and from school for school-related activities. The Code section is 321.194 Special minors’ licenses. Here is what is written. The drive must take the most direct or accessible route and can only drive between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. over the most direct and accessible route between the licensee’s residence and schools of enrollment or the closets school bus stop or public transportation service and between schools or enrollment, for the purpose of attending classes or extracurricular activities within the school district. That’s a mouthful and these code sections aren’t easily understood. Generally they are allowed to have passengers but they can’t have more passengers than there are seat belts, a requirement that implies seat belts must be worn.
So let’s recap the mistakes that were made:
1. Not wearing seatbelts.
2. Driving on an Interstate.
3. Driving a route that is not a direct or permissible route.
4. Taxiing passengers for a food run.
5. Trying to squeeze in too many stops in two short a period of time.
6. Disobeying the law that requires teens not to drive except to and from school events. Last I checked McDonald’s isn’t a school event and they don’t have classes.
7. Were there distractions in the van that caused the driver to lose control? We may never know.
Does the law allow the driver to taxi passengers for the convenience of parents? I’m not sure I would agree that it does. Was all of this avoidable? Absolutely. One of the lessons to learn is for parents to stop distracting teens with asking the wrong questions; stupid questions such as why are there so many lawsuits? Hate the lawyers all you want but start asking the right question; the one that will reduce the number of accidents and in turn the number of lawsuits.
What were the distractions in the van?
Why were these kids thinking they could cheat the law intended to keep them safe?
Why was the youthful driver being a taxi driver?
Why were they even on I-380?
If adults knew they were going on a food run, why didn't someone step up and say, "No." you're not allowed to do that. Do it and I'm calling your parents.
Why wasn't everyone wearing their seatbelts?
If there were cell phones in the van, why? What purpose did they serve?
If there was texting going on why? Why is it necessary to pay attention not to texting but to driving?
And the most important question is...
Why are there so many accidents and injuries?
See Radio Iowa, Teenage girl killed, two others injured in eastern Iowa wreck
UPDATE: Teen Killed, Two Injured in I-380 Accident
NEWS UPDATE - 1 killed in rollover accident
I send my condolences to the families and rest my case.
We've been covering Interstate travel safety for the past two-weeks on the Injuryboard and a few of my fellow members have jawed about it nonstop. I know that Wayne Parsons, my friend Devon Glass from Michigan, Mike Bryant from Minnesota, Pierce Egerton from North Carolina and Rick Shapiro from Virginia will all join in with my sentiments about being frustrated. Parents frustrate us when they talk all about tort reform and then turn a blind eye to what their children do. Tort reform isn't about the other guy, it's about us and the decisions we make. Tort reform is actually a distraction from the root cause of injuries and accidents. Taking away the rights of people to receive compensation isn't going to stop the accidents that cause injury and death. All tort reform will do is make those injured or the families of those killed miserable. So stop distracting everyone with taking away the right to receive compensation and ignoring the root causes of injury and death on the highways of America. If you have questions about what we’ve written call or write to each of us. We don’t ask that you agree, but we do ask that you think and discuss the issues.
You can follow our discussion by reading these articles.
UPDATE FOR CONSIDERATION: A recent Des Moines Register article takes a look at the police investigation in another case involving Alyssa Jo Vdnerhoff, a 15-year-old who lost her life when the truck she was driving went out of control and rolled. They wondered if she was text messaging, either reading or sending at the time when she lost control. Vanderhoff was from Marathon and was Iowa's only female bull rider.
I think this series on interstate highway safety is concluding with this post. Here is the series we ran. Our next series will start in a few days. Being busy lawyers it's not always easy to jump right into a new subject and have copy ready for print.
Are Double-Bottomed Semis More or Less Dangerous to You? - Devon Glass from Church Wyble, P.C. (Michigan), August 26, 2009
Who wins and loses when a Ford Focus and a fully-loaded semi-truck crash? - Steve Lombardi from The Lombardi Law Firm (Iowa), August 25, 2009
Hawaii Freeway Chronicles #1: What Are The Danger Points On H-1, H-2 and H-3?, by Wayne Parsons of Wayne Parsons Law Offices. (Hawaii), August 27, 2009
The Interstate Highway Graveyard, “Speed Kills”, Lombardi, August 28, 2009
Why Speeders on the Highway Cause More Serious Accidents, Glass, August 28, 2009
Death and Injury On Interstate Highways Increase With Higher Speed Limits, Wayne Parsons, August 29, 2009 2:31 AM
Drunk Drivers Caused 40% of Traffic Fatalities In Hawaii In 2006, Wayne Parsons, August 31, 2009 12:16 AM
Interstate Highways Are No Place For Drunk Drivers Over The Labor Day Weekend, Wayne Parsons | September 01, 2009 4:36 PM
Uninsured Motorist Car Insurance: It’s Your Most Important Car Insurance and Here Is Why, Rick Shapiro, September 01, 2009 10:30 AM
Uninsured Drivers: Who Are These People?, Pierce Egerton , September 02, 2009 12:00 PM
Risky Drivers Don't Just Drive Drunk and Speed - They Often Don't have Insurance , Wayne Parsons, September 02, 2009 4:09PM
The National Uninsured: Why You Need Uninsured Motorist Coverage In Minnesota, Mike Bryant, September 04, 2009 3:24 PM
Deteriorated Interstate Highways And Roadways In Every State Add To Fatalities, Wayne Parsons, September 10, 2009
On March 30, 2009 at 1:30 38 year old Jeffery Hamman of Sioux City hit a semi (drove his pickup truck right into the rear) that was pulled over on the shoulder for a mechanical problem. The semi was driven by 62 year-old Carlos Yon of Miramar Florida. Mr hammon was transported to Saint Luke’s Regional Medical Center for what authorities are saying are “possible minor injuries.
So what could have caused Hamman to drive directly into the rear of a semi-truck disabled on the road side?
Here are a few possibilities:
Alcohol intoxication of the driver.
Inattention.
Distractions.
Obstruction.
Being in a hurry.
Talking on a cell phone.
Texting on a cell phone or Blackberry.
Picking something up off the floor.
Adjusting the radio setting or selecting a new CD.
Watching a small DVD player.
Kids in the back seat.
Food or drink preparation.
Writing a note on a tablet.
Reading a map, book or newspaper.
Combing his hair or putting on makeup. (Yes ladies you know you do this.)
Sliding out of control from some other cause.
Attempt to avoid a deer or other animal.
Falling asleep at the wheel.
Getting something out of the glove box.
Spilling coffee in your lap and paying more attention to your pants than to your driving.
Arguing with a passenger.
Changing clothes.
Looking for or getting your sun glasses.
I've seen all of this in my career as a personal injury lawyer.
On March 14th 2009 Lisa Marie Adams (17), Joseph Daniel Widmer (18), and Brendt Michael Fetzer were headed Westbound on 340th and lost control entering the South ditch and rolled. Lisa Marie Adams died from the resulting injuries, while Joseph was taken by Aircare to the hospital. An investigation is ongoing. No indication if Adams was wearing a seatbelt.
The time of the crash was 2:55 A.M. at 340TH ST W OF HALF MOON AVE in Johnson County. Eighteen year old Joseph Widmer was taken by helicopter to the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.
The investigation will likely focus on the toxicology analysis conducted on the decedent, Lisa Adams. First they will examine her blood alcohol content to determine if she had been drinking and was legally intoxicated. The officers have likely interviewed the other passengers to determine where they had been and were heading. Also the contents of the vehicle will be examined to determine if there are any clues that will help explain things. Are there liquor bottles or store receipts with times and contents purchased? Empty, open and full bottles can often time give clues. Drugs in the vehicle can correlate with blood analysis. Measurements of the tread depth on each tire will be made and along with road surface and weather conditions will be correlated for friction factors. The crush depth of the car, skid mark lengths and impact will be examined to determine speed of the vehicle. The speedometer will be looked at and photographed to see if it stopped on any speed.
KETV reports that an Iowa woman was killed after driving into a construction area and running into a Caterpilla asphalt grinder along Interstate 29 near Glenwood, Iowa. The woman’s age was 66 and she was pronounced dead at the scene.
The work was being done just north of the Glenwood exit in Mills County, Iowa.
Two people on their way to Texas were involved in a car accident at the I-35 South and I-235 West interchange. Bradley Sea, 21 was driving a pickup truck west on I235 and turned right to go around the turn which connects with I-35 South. He went off the shoulder and down the embankment.
His passenger, Cortnee Anderson, 20 was ejected from the truck. She was admitted but is in fair condition at Iowa Methodist Medical Center. The two were heading to Texas.
Being very familiar with this turn, I take it several times a week on my way home, I can say it’s treacherous. The curve is dangerously sharp for the Interstate speed, there is no guardrail to stop a car or truck and the embankment is severely down towards the buildings that set just across the fence.
An aerial map is available through the Polk County Assessor’s website.
The driver is likely to be assessed fault for this collision: loss of control, failure to maintain a slower speed and failure to drive using due care.
Today’s post is about negligence, what it is and how to view evidence to appreciate what is negligent behavior. Here is a headline and the opening line of a news story out of Indiana.
Snow causes crash and brief
closing of I-65 near Lowell
LOWELL | An early Saturday snowstorm is being blamed for a traffic accident that briefly closed a south Lake County section of Interstate 65 and left a downstate man injured.
For years I’ve read headlines and opening sentences in news stories with the lines blaming weather conditions for causing accidents. The idea that snow or weather or even slippery conditions can cause an accident is absolutely preposterous. There is snow outside in my driveway this morning and as I walk to the mailbox to retrieve the morning’s newspaper I notice that the driveway is slippery. The slippers I’m wearing don’t quite fit snuggly on my feet. (Acorn slippers) There is a car sitting in the driveway with snow on it and all around it. So far the snow hasn’t caused an accident. Why not? If snow causes accidents why hasn’t my car in the driveway had an accident? It’s been snowing all night and still there is no accident. The driveway is even slippery and so far no accident. I walked all the way down to the end of the driveway and back and still there is no accident. Maybe I should come back in an hour to see if there’s been an accident. What do you think will there be one? Will I come out to find the fenders crunched and wrecked car?
What’s necessary to have an accident? That’s the place where negligence starts. We need a driver or drivers. No driver and I dare say the car, snow and slippery driveway can coexist all day without having an “accident”.
Now let us turn the discussion to duty. As a juror sitting in a civil car accident case or as the judge will say, a tort case, there are four elements to be proven and then analyzed. The four elements are duty, a breach of duty, proximate cause and damages. Today we are looking at the first two elements, duty and breach of duty. Back to the snow.
As a lawyer with 28 plus years of experience trying civil lawsuits I am confident in saying snow has no duty not to be slippery or to avoid falling on the public highways. I am equally confident in my assertion that no judge would instruct a jury that any law required snow, not to be slippery or on the highway. That I am certain. Drivers on the other hand do have certain duties. A duty is a standard or rule of the road (a law or regulation) that driver must follow in using the public highways. Those duties can include restrictions on speed, when to pass, when not to pass, which side of the road each car should be driving, when to brake and when to make adjustments to the manner in which they drive. Adjustments are the key to this analysis. If it snows and the roadway is slippery the driver must slow down and operate the car or truck in a manner that allows the vehicle to be safely operated. It is the driver who has a duty not the snow. The slick conditions are just that; a condition which the driver must evaluate and adjust his or her driving habits to avoid colliding with other cars, trucks, people, signs, buildings, bridges, culverts and other fixed or moving objects. Drivers are what is needed in my driveway before there can be an accident and it’s those drivers that have the duty and can breach the duty. So when you’re sitting on a jury and someone says that it was the snow or other weather that caused the accident, explain to them how wrong they are and then sit back, hopefully you've wore that power tie or skirt, and see how quickly you’ll become the foreperson.
Here is the full report from Indiana about the snow having caused an accident. While it’s permissible with news reporters to write this way, it’s not proper for lawyers or jurors to think this way. People cause accidents, not weather or cars without drivers.
Snow causes crash and brief
closing of I-65 near Lowell
LOWELL | An early Saturday snowstorm is being blamed for a traffic accident that briefly closed a south Lake County section of Interstate 65 and left a downstate man injured.
Indiana State Police said Kevin Tomeo, 30, of Avon, In., west of Indianapolis, suffered head and internal injures. He was transported to St. Anthony Medical Center in Crown Point.
The National Weather Service said Saturday an overnight snow system deposited a half inch of snow across much of Northwest Indiana.
Police said an unidentified passenger car was southbound on I-65 shortly after 3 a.m. Saturday when it lost control on a patch of black ice that formed from snow melt at the 238 mile marker, two miles south of the Indiana 2 exit.
Police said the passenger car pulled out of the skid and continued unharmed, but Tomeo's Jeep Cherokee, which was traveling behind it, lost control when he attempted to brake to avoid a collision.
Police said the Jeep began spinning, hit the guard rail and bounced back onto the highway where it was hit by a 2003 Mack truck pulling a double trailer.
Police said the tractor trailer jackknifed, hit the guard rail on the right side of the pavement and came to a halt, blocking all southbound lanes of travel for two and a half hours.
Police said the tractor trailer driver, Roosevelt Bell, 28, of Park Forest, Ill., was uninjured, but ticketed for driving too fast for road conditions.
The National Weather Service said temperatures will remain in the low 30s, but no more snow is forecast until Tuesday.
Our goal at the InjuryBoard is to prevent injury. To prevent injury let’s examine the available data and government policies that predispose this country’s infrastructure to increased risk of injury. In this post we examine bridges in our states, cities and towns asking the question: Is your hometown beyond the sudden failure and collapse of the I-35W Interstate System Bridge in Minneapolis?
Many parents have to wonder if the bridge your family drove over during rush hour traffic or with an oncoming farm equipment is one of those bridges classified as structurally deficient. You have a right to know.
There are sources available on the Internet where you can examine the condition of bridges in your hometown. There are a couple of different ways to determine which bridges in your community are safer than others. But of course there is no way of knowing if any one bridge is likely to fail because the weight on every bridge changes by the minute. What this information does reveal to us is whether or not failure is more or less likely based on age, existing condition and design that is combined to give each bridge a rating. The ratings go from zero to one hundred with the highest rating being good. A rating below
1. Which bridges in my hometown are not considered sufficient for today’s traffic? (For an explanation of what is and is not structurally deficient or functionally obsolete see the definition below or the previous post Highway Safety - Finding information about bridge safety in your hometown.
Short Answer: Without knowing your hometown there is no way to tell, but you can check those bridges and each sufficiency rating along with the traffic numbers.
2. How do bridges in my hometown compare to the Minnesota Bridge that failed?
Short Answer: Without knowing your hometown there is no way to tell for sure, but you can check those bridges and each sufficiency rating along with the traffic numbers. After you know the sufficiency rating and daily traffic count compare it to the following information. The I-35W Minnesota Bridge is Bridge No. 9340. The bridge catastrophically failed during the evening rush hour on August 1, 2007, collapsing to the river and riverbanks beneath.
What was the sufficiency rating of Bridge 9340?
The June 10, 2005 bridge inspection report noted Bridge No. 9340 to have critical fractures and cracking. The June 15, 2006 bridge inspection report noted fatigue cracks in the approach decking and fatigue cracking was noted. On 8/02/2007 the sufficiency rating was a 50 per Minnesota DOT Bridge Inventory Inspection Report for Bridge 9340. Inspection reports were issued in 2005 rating the bridge as structurally deficient and suggesting replacement. See the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Bridge Inventory database. Problems were noted in two subsequent inspection reports. [42][43]
Makes me wonder whether we can trust the engineers calculations.
3. How big is the bridge problem in the United States?
Short Answer: I’m not sure anyone can really say. We have sufficiency ratings based on data but with weight on the bridges changing by the minute how can anyone really be sure of the rated condition? For the most part bridges that are unsafe are either replaced or have the use restricted.
I’ve commented in the past about how after going to law school no lawyer can ever look at the world in the same way. We know too much and little things mean a lot to us. What I’ve learned from reading about bridge safety ratings is that when you see a sign limiting the weight of trucks that are allowed to use a bridge, that’s a pretty good indication the bridge, is structurally deficient. Knowing that of the 600,000 public road bridges listed in the National Bridge Inventory, roughly 12%, or 74,000, are classified as structurally deficient, you shouldn’t be scared but you should be concerned.
So where can you check on the function and structure of the bridges you drive on? You can find the rating of any bridge in your state at the AASHTO site where the information is listed by state and hyperlinked.
Today we will look at how your state ranks against other states for number of bridges needing replacement. See how your state stacks up against the rest.
To see how your state ranks against other states for number of structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridges visit the U.S. Census Bureau’s listing of the inventory.
1016. Bridge Inventory--Non-Deficient and Deficient[Based on the National Bridge Inventory program] |