The Verdict - The Lombardi Law Firm Blog
Here at the Lombardi Law Firm we add blog content that is personal to those involved in accidents. We write this way so you have an understanding of how we think and handle cases - your case. We invite you to call us if you think we can help you resolve your legal problems. We settle most of our cases, because we do the basic legal work necessary to understand the facts of your case. We offer on our website, relevant and concise information that you will be helpful to you as you get ready to settle or to try your case.
We can and will do the same for you. That's my promise. So call us today!
Steve Lombardi, 515-222-1110 or email@example.com
Where can you look for answers to whether Aspartame is or is not safe?
What this all comes down to is a personal choice. The government for a long time believed saccharin was safe. They told us DDT was safe, it wasn't. Sooner or later need to just decide and leave the arguing to history.
I'll collect a few of the websites both pro and con and let you do some reading to see on what side you want to be on.
PRO - I LOVE ASPARTAME I EAT IT RIGHT OUT OF THE PACKAGE!
http://www.aspartame.net/ - is another pro-site with the latest and greatest information about why Aspartame is safe. This site includes a "Scientific Library" for you to peruse.
http://www.aspartame.info/ - This site includes news, FAQ, opinions, a library, links and an Aspartame Movie. The nice part of this site is it clearly and conspicuously tells you the Aspartame Information Service is provided by Ajinomoto, a producer of aspartame and supplier to well known food and drink makers.
CON - NO WAY AM I GOING TO EAT ANYTHING WITH ASPARTAME!
www.321recipes.com - This site includes physician contributions, the history and all that supports the belief it's bad for you.
http://www.aspartamekills.com/ - is as it says dedicated to proving to you that Aspartame will kill you. This site has a pretty good collection of video interviews and exposes'.
http://www.presidiotex.com/aspartame/index.html - is a support group for those believing they have been victimized by eating Aspartame.
The melamine poisoning scandal along with a recent movie has me thinking about DDT. Remember DDT? DDT is formally named dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. If you can say that entire word you get to the bonus round of today's blog. I remember as a young boy my mother walking around the foundation of our Warwick, Rhode Island family home on Vineyard Road with a cardboard container very much like today's bread crumb dispensers. She would shake the white powder onto the concrete foundation and grass to kill the bugs, as she would proudly declare. "Don't get near it! I mean it!" she'd yell at us. I could have said instructed but there was no instruction going on with the tone of her voice; she wanted to put the fear of God's wrath into us and she did. I never touched it but can't say much for my older brother. He's a little light in the head so I can't speak for what he may have done.
Today mom looks back and like the two eggs we had to eat every morning she now believes she was killing us slowly.
I'll ask again, do you remember DDT?
One dictionary defines DDT as a noun.
Definition: an insecticide effective especially against malaria-carrying mosquitoes. It has been banned in many countries since 1974 because of its toxicity, its persistence in the environment, and its ability to accumulate in living tissue. C14H9Cl5.
Dictionary.com lists the chemical composition as:
DDT, Chemistry - a white, crystalline, water-insoluble solid, C14H9Cl5, usually derived from chloral by reaction with chlorobenzene in the presence of fuming sulfuric acid: used as an insecticide and as a scabicide and pediculicide: agricultural use prohibited in the U.S. since 1973.
Wikipedia describes it as "DDT (from its trivial name, Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane) is one of the best known synthetic pesticides. It is a chemical with a long, unique, and controversial history."
DDT was supposed to be used for killing misquitos to annihilate malaria. DDT was used extensively in the 1940's and 1950's then the whole cancer thing got in the way and low and behold DDT died a quick death. Of course there were casuaties along the way and along the genetic highway. DDT tends to stay in the genes and is passed on to the next generation.
A Taiwaneze filmmaker has just released Surviving Evil, a film that explores the 1979 controversy surrounding PCBs and how the population was exposed and continues to suffer. The Taiwan Journal explores the film and how food contamination caused human suffering long after the source of the contamination would be discovered.
"In April 1979, a handful of students and teachers at Taichung County's Huei Ming School in central Taiwan discovered they were suffering from rashes, or exhibiting symptoms of chloracne--a skin condition consisting of blackheads, cysts and pustules. As time went by, the number of afflicted increased to more than 100.
Tests conducted on the victims revealed they had been poisoned by PCBs, or polychlorinated biphenyls. Around 2,000 people from the nearby counties of Changhua, Hsinchu and Miaoli were eventually identified as having been exposed to the toxic chemicals."
Surviving Evil is a documentary that explores the suffering of real people from contaminated oils used for food preparation. The PCB contamination of 1979 is very similar to the oil contamination in Japan 40 years earlier.
The filmmaker opens this documentary film with an observation.
"Isn't the melamine contamination outbreak a repeat of PCB poisoning in Taiwan from 30 years ago? And isn't the latter a repeat of what happened in Japan 40 years ago? Unless we remember the past, the next tragedy is just around the corner." It closes with a message laden in significance for Taiwan's leaders, "[we don't know] whereto people with eyes will lead Taiwan, but blind people will definitely find their own way."
Today, several countries continue to use DDT as a pesticide to control disease carrying insects. The World Health Organization in 2006 came out in support of using DDT inside homes.
WASHINGTON, Sept. 15 - The World Health Organization on Friday forcefully endorsed wider use of the insecticide DDT across Africa to exterminate and repel the mosquitoes that cause malaria. The disease kills more than a million people a year, 800,000 of them young children in Africa.Skip to next paragraph
Dr. Arata Kochi, who leads the group's global malaria program, unequivocally declared at a news conference on Friday that DDT was the most effective insecticide against malaria and that it posed no health risk when sprayed in small amounts on the inner walls of people's homes. Expanding its use is essential to reviving the flagging international campaign to control the disease, he said.
Dr. Kochi has powerful allies on DDT and, more broadly, on using insecticide sprays, in Congress and the Bush administration - an odd bedfellows coalition for an agency of the United Nations, which has often been at odds with the White House.
Which countries use DDT?
"There are now 17 African countries using at least some indoor spraying of insecticides to combat malaria. Only 10 of them use DDT - Eritrea, Madagascar, Ethiopia, Swaziland, South Africa, Mauritius, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Namibia and Zambia - the W.H.O. said. Too many countries in Africa have shied away from DDT, Dr. Kochi said, because of the nasty environmental reputation it earned in an earlier era when it was widely sprayed on crops - dangers that do not apply when spraying small amounts indoors."
It's estimated that over 2,000,000 children per year mostly under the age of 5 die of malaria. Worldwide each year 200 to 500 million people get malaria. Those numbers got the New York Times singing "What the World Needs Now is DDT" They are not alone in support of allowing developing countries to use DDT. The World Policy Forum supports it's use.
I'm not sure what company owns the DDT patent. Monsanto originally produced it and to some extent may control its production. For the most part governments control distribution. Searching the Monsanto site for information concerning DDT produced zero results.
Who is promoting DDT usage?
The Pesticide Action Network has done a decent job of listing information on both sides and has an extensive bibliography. Here is the PAN resources list:
- 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa_Fighting_Malaria
- 2. http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/06/29/rachel_carson/index1.html
- 3. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Roger_Bate
- 4. http://www.cei.org/dyn/view_expert.cfm?expert=105
- 5. http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=230
- 6. http://www.aei.org/scholars/filter.all,scholarID.76/scholar.asp
- 7. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_Tren
- 8. http://www.fightingdiseases.org/main/articles.php?articles_id=726
- 9. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Campaign_for_Fighting_Diseases
- 10. http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1441
- 11. http://www.cdfe.org/
- 12. http://www.cei.org
- 13. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Henry_Miller
- 14. http://www.hooverdigest.org/034/miller.html
- 15. http://www.hoover.org/pubaffairs/dailyreport/9216491.html
- 16. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,173766,00.html
- 17. http://www.junkscience.com
- 18. http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=174
- 19. http://www.core-online.org
- 20. http://www.freezerbox.com/archive/article.php?id=337
- 21. http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1038
- 22. http://www.eco-imperialism.com/content/article.php3?id=205
- 23. http://www.wikipedia.org/Niger_Innis
- 24. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=National_Center_for_Public_Po...
- 25. http://www.lobbywatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=174&page=C
- 26. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bonner_Cohen
- 27. http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=709
- 28. http://www.nationalcenter.org/Z032407=uganda_will_use_ddt_fight_malaria....
- 29. http://prfamerica.org/speeches/10th/EnvironmentalismConsequences.html
- 30. http://www.alternet.org/environment/52534/
- 31. http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Senator_blocks_honors_for_Rachel_Carson_05...
- 32. http://www.okimc.org/node/656
- 33. http://www.fightingmalaria.org/news.aspx?id=539
Tomorrow let's look at PCBs.
1. Is your kids Halloween candy safe?
With Halloween being right around the corner food safety has to be on every mother’s mind. What candy is made in China? What is the likelihood that melamine could contaminate the candy my child is given? Ever parent needs to consider warning their children to eat no candy while on the go but to wait till they get home and allow the parents the opportunity to inspect their booty. No ifs, ands, or buts allowed.
And if there is any possibility of contamination, play it safe and throw it out!
1. Candy made in China sickens 23 schoolchildren in Cebu.
3. Melamine found in sunflowers.
5. Jelly beans.
7. Lollypops made in China.
Here is the querie I Googled: Where can I get a complete list of Chinese companies that manufacture candy and that are sold in the United States?
What came up? Company List - Found 547 companies for 'Candy'
Obviously it would be senseless to list those companies here. This Halloween instead of risking kidney failure for your children write to the lobbyists send a message to the foreign companies who sell candy in the U.S. market by not buying their candy. This will demand they clean up their act.
And if you didn’t have enough to worry about with melamine, look what Mars and Nestle are lobbying the halls of Washington about. The right to sell candy intended for 3 – to 8- year olds that has a small toy inside the chocolate shell.
The fight is over a product called Nestle Magic, a chocolate ball covering a plastic shell, inside of which is a small plastic toy in the form of a Disney character. The product is aimed at 3- to 8-year-olds.
A child is supposed to break open the chocolate, separate the two halves of the plastic shell and take out the hard plastic figure. Some consumer groups have complained that the product is dangerous because the toy presents a choking hazard. They argue that it is irresponsible to associate toys with something that goes into the mouth, like candy.
It makes me wonder what the children of lobbyists eat for Halloween.